1

Riverside Employment Attorneys

Protecting Employee Rights

Riverside Employment Contracts Lawyer

Implied Contracts

These days, implied and oral contracts are generally not valid legal theories against employers. If there is any language in an employee manual, or personnel document the employee signed, stating the employee is at-will or there is not a contract of employment there will almost certainly not be an implied or oral contract.

Even if you worked for a small employer without any written policies, you will have to affirmatively show that something happened worthy of the court implying a contract. Implied contracts can exist if the employee is a very long term employee, or promises of longevity such as retirement are made. Promises creating an implied contract may also include employees who are promised large sums of money or longevity if they institute a new process, set up a new location, or do something quite large for a company. However, any written language about the employer being at-will most likely will defeat an implied contract. Moreover, in the case of commissions, any written commission agreement is likely to defeat an implied or oral contract for commissions.

Call us today at (951) 367-1000 to talk to a Riverside Employment Lawyer

No Contract, You Might Still Deserve To Be Paid


The absence of a contract does not preclude recovery under quantum meruit because quantum meruit does not require the existence of a contract, Maglica v. Maglica, 66 Cal.App.4th 442, 449, 78 Cal.Rptr.2d 101, 104 (1998); Huskinson v. Wolf, 32 Cal.4th 458, 9 Cal.Rptr.3d 696 (2004). Actions lie in common counts even when the services were rendered under an unenforceable contract, Parker v. Solomon, 171 Cal.App.2d 125 (1959); Iverson v. Berwald, 76 Cal.App.4th 990, 996, 90 Cal.Rptr.2d 665, 669 (1999). The recovery for quantum meruit is the reasonable value of the services rendered, Maglica at 448, 104. citing to numerous cases. "The underlying idea behind quantum meruit is the law's underlying distaste for unjust enrichment, Id. "Contract price and reasonably value of services rendered are two separate things; sometimes the reasonable value of services exceeds a contract price," Id. at 450, 105 "Resulting benefit is an open-ended standard, which, as we have mentioned earlier, can result in the plaintiff obtaining recovery amounting to de factor ownership in a business all out of reasonable relation to the value of services rendered, Id. at 450, 105.

Historic Contract Cases

A person who has been unjustly enriched at the expense of another is required to make restitution to the other, California Federal Bank v. Matreyek, 8 Cal.App.4th 125 (1992). The law independently imposes restitution and compensation regardless of express contract, Lucky Auto Supply v. Turner, 244 Cal.App.2d 872 (1966). Unjust enrichment is a remedy available for benefits one unjustly obtains including through fraud, Nibbi Brothers, Inc. v. Brannan Street Investors, 205 Cal.App.3d 1415 (1988).

One form of common count is a common count for work or labor done, Philpott v. Sup. Crt., 1 Cal.2d 512, 518 (1934), and that form of common count is known as quantum meruit. Another form of common count is for fraud and when a common count is based upon fraud, the fraud does not need to be alleged with specificity, J. C. Peacock v. Hasko, 196 Cal.App.2d 353, 361-362, 16 Cal.Rptr. 518 (1961). Because quantum meruit was recognized as an action at law in 1950, there is a right to jury trial, Jogani v. Sup. Crt., 165 Cal.App.4th 901, 907, 81 Cal.Rptr.3d 503 (2008).

Quantum meruit does not depend on an implied contract, and is not a legal theory rooted in quasi-contract, Maglica at 456, 109. However, quantum meruit is also appropriate when a plaintiff, working under an express contract, performs additional work, at defendant's request that is not specific in the contract, Combs v. Glide, 112 Cal.App.2d 781, 786-787 (1952).

Employment contracts today and its language on manuals can get messy. If you are in need of an employment contracts lawyer, contact us. Proudly Representing Employees In: Banning, Beaumont, Blythe, Cathedral City, Coachella, Corona, Hemet, Indio, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, La Quinta, Menifee, Moreno Valley, Murrieta, Norco, Palm Desert, Palm Springs, Perris, Rancho Mirage, Riverside, San Jacinoto, Temecula. Contact us today or call us now at (951) 367-1000 for a Riverside employment contract lawyer

Our Firm: No upfront fees or costs

Contingency Fee Representation

All employment cases for employees are taken on a contingency basis. We are only paid a fee when and if we win your case, and we advance all litigation costs. Our goal is to make expert legal representation accessible to every hardworking employee.

Serving Riverside County

We have proudly served all of Riverside County since 1993.

The Employment Lawyers Group has successfully handled

2,000+

Separate California Employment Cases

Sample Case Results

Disclaimer: These results are based on the facts of these specific cases and do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any future case.

Our California Locations

BakersfieldBakersfield

BakersfieldLaborAttorney.com

5401 Business Park S, #214,
Bakersfield CA 93309

(661) 412-9600

Los AngelesLos Angeles

EmployeeLawCA.com

611 Wilshire Blvd, #1023,
Los Angeles CA 90017

(323) 525-1600

Orange CountyOrange County

WorkLawyerOC.com

2522 Chambers Rd, #100,
Tustin CA 92780

(714) 210-8000

RiversideRiverside

RiversideEmploymentLawyer.com

9496 Magnolia Ave, #208,
Riverside CA 92503

(951) 367-1000

SacramentoSacramento

SacramentoLaborAttorney.com

777 Campus Commons Rd, #200,
Sacramento CA 95825

(916) 340-0000

San BernardinoSan Bernardino

EmploymentAttorneySanBernardino.com

337 N. Vineyard Ave, #400,
Ontario CA 91764

(909) 663-2100

San DiegoSan Diego

SanDiegoEmployeeLawyer.com

330 “A” St, #60,
San Diego CA 92101

(619) 320-3000

San FranciscoSan Francisco

BayAreaEmploymentAttorney.net

524 Union St, #400,
San Francisco CA 94133

(877) 525-0700

San JoseSan Jose

SivalleyLaborLawyer.com

111 N. Market St, #300,
San Jose CA 95113

(877) 525-0700

Sherman OaksSherman Oaks

WorkLawyerCa.com

13418 Ventura Blvd,
Sherman Oaks CA 91423

(818) 783-7300

TorranceTorrance

JobTerminationLaw.com

3655 Torrance Blvd, 3rd Floor,
Torrance CA 90503

(310) 842-8600

VenturaVentura

VenturaEmploymentLawyer.com

4030 West Hemlock St,
Oxnard CA 93035

(805) 200-0100

Additional Sites

About Firm Founder, Karl Gerber

Firm Founder, Karl Gerber, has been an employment wrongful termination attorney since 1993. He has represented a wide range of employees throughout California.

Mr. Gerber has won 51 of the binding arbitrations and jury trials he first chaired, and a number of his appeals are published. This deep trial experience is the foundation of the firm's strategic approach to litigation.

The employment attorneys employed by the Employment Lawyers Group have worked at the firm well in excess of five years, have also tried many different labor cases, and have all been extensively trained on employment wrongful termination by Karl Gerber.

Ready to Discuss Your Case?

Your rights as an employee matter. Contact us for a free, confidential case review.

Contact Us

Share Your Workplace Situation With Our Attorneys

0 / 500 characters

Thank You!

Our attorneys are reviewing your case. We will get back to you as soon as possible!

Prefer to speak directly?

Call Us: (951) 367-1000